The idea that Aye had something to do with the possible murder is intriguing. What evidence exists that makes aye seem guilty?

The evidence that not only does the young king require the help of senior advisors to help him rule the kingdom, but also the presence of the ring found in Cairo that shows the marriage between Aye and king Tut's wife seems to show that Aye has more motive to be involved in the king's death.

Explanation:

In the article "CSI: Was King Tut Murdered?", the untimely death of the young pharaoh King Tutankhamun is investigated. The article presents the events that led to the young king ascending to the throne and his death.

The belief that Aye, the young king's father's former advisor was involved in his death is one of the cases that intrigue historians. And they are right to believe so, because of some facts that make him seem guilty.

First is, Aye was privy to the need for a possible heir to succeed the present king, and considering how young the pharaoh was, that meant the administration and everything needed to be done by a senior official who knows the workings of the kingdom. This is where Aye comes, for he was a former advisor to King Tut's father. Added to that, Aye also became the next pharaoh after King Tut's death, by marrying the young king's widowed wife, Ankhesenamun. This was proven by the ring discovered in Cairo that proved the marriage.

These two pieces of evidence show that Aye seems more guilty of being involved in the young king's death than being innocent.

ideology

explanation:

i need more info !