Pls pls help! ill mark brainliest if correct! use the second image attached to answer the question

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Abasic premise of the national response framework is that: a. most incidents begin and end locally and are managed at the local or tribal level. b. response partners use nonstandard structures to allow for flexible and scalable responses. c. readiness to act encourages response partners to self-dispatch to an incident scene. d. incidents should be managed at the highest jurisdictional level possible.

Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement