During the early 1200s, a group of English lords forced their king to sign a document known as the Magna Carta. This document accomplished several goals for these English lords such as ensuring that the king would not unfairly tax them or take their land. It stated that the king must follow English law. It also stated that people could not be held in jail without being charged with a crime or without a lawful judgement from their peers. More specifically, it stated that no one will be denied or delayed in receiving a fair trial. Based on the passage, the Magna Carta limited the power of the English
A.
merchants.
B.
peasants.
C.
monarchs.
D.
lords.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

How do corporate finances, investor expectations and external forces influence stock prices and possibly pose a risk to investors

The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?