Select the correctly cited article. Select the best answer from the choices provided.

A. Peter Whoriskey. The Washington Post. "After Katrina, new fear along coast." 5/30/06: A1.

B. Sutton, Jane. "75 Prisoners Join in Hunger Strike at U. S. Base in Guantanamo Bay." The Washington Post. 29 May 2006: A7.
http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/ 29/AR2006052901087.html?nav=hcmodul e. Accessed
5/30/06.

C. Dafna Linzer. U. S. Urges Financial Sanctions on Iran. The Washington Post. 30 May 2006. http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/05/28/AR20 06052800999.html.

D.
"In Harm's Way: Guns and Kids." Sandra G. Boodman. "The Washington Post." 30 May 2006: HE1.

Knowing that you will be punished for breaking mom's favorite dish is a function of the

What name is given to the money that had to be paid by germany in ww2

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.