The game "Mountain Adventure” is a huge hit. Kids can choose to play as different avatars, such as Liam, a red-haired teenage boy; Calvin, a Black teenage boy; and Quinn, a Chinese American teenage boy. A group of girls, including Clara, writes an email to the game’s developers, reminding them that girls like to play the game too. The developers create the avatar of Hannah, a blond teenage girl. Clara is disappointed that they did not show intersectionality in their decision. What does that mean? The video game company should have written back to the girls to get their input about adding new avatars. The game developers listened to the complaint in the email and made a change to the game that was unnecessary. The male characters are of several races, but there is no representation of female characters of different racial identities. The game will not look as interesting when there are different male avatars on the screen but a bunch of female avatars that look like one another.

this null effect is caused by a weak manipulation and ineffective internal validity. in a scientific study, as the one dr. morimoto is trying to perfom, internal validity refers to the confidence placed in the cause-effect relationship and to how well an experiment is done and able to eliminate confounding variables.        

the technology changed agriculture in an impacting manner since many people left the field work by a cellular or other technological appliances

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; preominantly inattentive;