Q1. Which response to the Paradox of Free Will concludes that freedom of the will is impossible because causal determinism is true? A. Libertarianism
B. Hard Determinism

Q2. Aristotle claimed that future contingents are neither true nor false. The standard conception of knowledge has it that knowledge implies truth. Given these two views, the surprise exam paradox does not get off the ground because
A. There is not going to be a next week.
B. One will not know the answers when one takes the surprise exam.
C. The teacher cannot know that she now has the intention of giving a surprise exam.

Thank you very much to whoever helped answer this question and explained it to me :)

6–7. white-collar crime. matthew simpson and others created and operated a series of corporate entities to defraud telecommunications companies, creditors, credit reporting agencies, and others. through these entities, simpson and the others used routing codes and spoofing services to make long-distance calls appear to be local. they stole other firms’ network capacity and diverted payments to themselves. they leased goods and services without paying for them. to hide their association with their corporate entities and with each other, they used false identities, addresses, and credit histories, and issued false bills, invoices, financial statements, and credit references,. did these acts constitute mail and wire fraud? discuss. [united states v. simpson, 741 f.3d 539 (5th cir. 2014)] (see types of crimes.)