Appellate courts may rule on a case without ever hearing an oral argument. a. true b. false

I feel this is true. An Appellate court may have the ability to review evidence and documentation without hearing an actual oral argument. I believe lower courts provided or required the need for oral arguments but on the Appellate level, all previous information can simply be reviewed from the lower courts and a decision be made at that time.

True :) go ahead and thank me

Ifound this on google “the change in control meant as house minority leader, pelosi was widely expected to become speaker of the house in the next congress. on november 16, 2006, the democratic caucus unanimously chose pelosi as the democratic candidate for speaker.” i hope this

Idont know which one is right   but i know that c is wrong and a might be wrong