Why did the dred scott v. sandford decision anger northerners? it made slavery legal in the territories. it sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery. it allowed for expansion of slavery into the north. it created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.

Explanation:

Dred Scott then filed his appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court, fully confident that they would see that he should be free. After 11 years, the Court ruled that he was still a slave because: Slaves were property and the federal government could not stop people from traveling with their belongings.

i'm not sure what you are asking, but it also served as a debtors colony, was ran by the trustees for 20 years until becoming a royal colony, and people had restrictions such as no slaves, and only 50 acres of land per person/ hope this !

- jack watson