subject
Social Studies, 21.07.2019 14:00 Ashleymsmith

Can the u. s. supreme court provide advice to the other branches regarding constitutional interpretation? yes, the process of judicial review includes an advisory role according to the constitution. yes, the process of judicial review includes proposed legislation and potential executive actions. no, the process of judicial review is limited to specific cases and controversies per the constitution. no, the process of judicial review is limited to state government laws that may conflict with federal law.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
Did the writers of the declaration of independence accomplish their goals (did we get our independence and the new government we wrote about)?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
This description of the "firm league of friendship" of states is a quotation from the
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
What changes occurred over time that was directly related to this event? alice paul
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Can the u. s. supreme court provide advice to the other branches regarding constitutional interpreta...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 17:20
question
Arts, 17.12.2020 17:20
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2020 17:20
question
Social Studies, 17.12.2020 17:20
Questions on the website: 13722361