Marlene charges an $80 winter coat to her credit card at a department store. After
Marlene gets the coat home, she notices that the tag says the coat's lining is 100%
wool. Marlene is allergic to wool, so she tries to return the coat. The store refuses
because Marlene has already removed the tags from the coat. Marlene requests a
chargeback on her credit card.
Have Marlene's rights been violated? Why or why not?
No; she has no legal ground to cancel the sale.
No; but she can still do the chargeback.
Yes; the implied warranty of merchantability has been violated.
• Yes, truth-in-advertising laws ensure that labels are accurate.

No; she can still do the charge back

Explanation:

I believe she should've checked the tags before buying them and you don't need to remove the tag to check the fabric so the store has the right to say no returns but she can still do the charge back if the bank allows her

answerfull dress rehearsal;

like many students at university, you may be unhappy about the results you attain in exams. you may feel that even with all you are doing there must be something more -- or different-- you could be doing to get better grades. we have all at some time or other heard of that student who only studies a couple of hours for final exams and scores a's every time. we stand in awe of those who seem to breeze through without undue effort and seem to need very little in the way of studying to nail an exam. the reasons for success, in what i think are the vast majority of cases, are less esoteric than many students think: successful students consistently apply a series of productive strategies with view to attaining clearly identified learning and grade goals throughout the academic term.