Americans may be increasingly relying on newsmagazines and mini-series for their current and historical information about the world. In defending the historical inaccuracies in a mini-series a writer remarked: "it is better for audiences to learn something that is untrue, if it is entertaining, than not to learn anything at all." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain thoroughly, and consider the implications for a society fueled by disinformation.

Like many students at university, you may be unhappy about the results you attain in exams. you may feel that even with all you are doing there must be something more -- or different-- you could be doing to get better grades. we have all at some time or other heard of that student who only studies a couple of hours for final exams and scores a's every time. we stand in awe of those who seem to breeze through without undue effort and seem to need very little in the way of studying to nail an exam. the reasons for success, in what i think are the vast majority of cases, are less esoteric than many students think: successful students consistently apply a series of productive strategies with view to attaining clearly identified learning and grade goals throughout the academic term.

Dis the correct answer man

Ibelieve that is true! but go with your gut.good luck!