To what extent do you think it is important for artists to strive toward creating something new and original? How can such works as Andy Warhol’s Thirty Are Better than One, that reuse earlier art, also be seen as creative and valuable?

First, let's complete the question and then we will answer it

Here is the complete question:

Pop art aimed to undermine the "high art" tendency to value only works that were "original" and "unique." To what extent do you think it is important for artists to strive toward creating something new and original? How can works such as Andy Warhol's "Thirty Are Better Than One", that reuse earlier art, also be seen as creative and valuable.

Our

If artists has the desire to come up with something new and authentically established, they need to be certain that it is something that the audience can clearly relate with.

Works as in the given case of Andy Warhol's "Thirty Are Better Than One", is pinpointed out to be creative and of high importance due to the fact that it makes or seem to create a photocopy of the Mona Lisa, which was at first developed bad produced by da Vinci and reflects the aspect of consumerism "more is better".