2. Do you think that anything is too graphic to be shown in news reports on television or in the newspaper? If so, what do you consider too graphic, and why? Certain things are just inappropriate to have on a service anyone can watch. News is meant to cover recent events, that being said we don't need too much detail, since people don't watch the news to see gore or nudity. We just didn't sign up to see that stuff. The news is meant to educate not disturb.

yes as you might be right, we watch news to educate our selves yet sometimes they do add a report or a video showing grafic disturbance normally when it's nudity it if for attention but when it is gore or violece, for example domestic abuse or or a murdure it is to imforme others to take precautions.

There is a thing such thing as too graphic even for the newspaper and television. I would consider like stated above that nudity and gore is too graphic since the news just needs to talk about the topic and us as the audience and look more in depth. The news could also put a trigger warning prior to showing the picture on the television. although a TW would work and the audience researching on there on I feel some of the gory pictures are invasive to the victims and families.  

i would say the answer is b. zigzag lines of the leaves. i believe this is the answer because zigzag lines go in different direction while the other options like: the vertical lines of the trees, the dotted lines on the road, and the curved lines of the park benches go in one direction.