Need help Paleontologists are still debating about whether modern behavior, language, and art appeared more recently in Europe, about 50,000 years ago or further back, based on findings such as the tools and artifacts found at the Blombos cave. What do you think? Do you think the artifacts show higher level thinking, or just a form of art? Explain your answer.

I believe it shows both higher level thinking as well as a form of art. The Blombos caves shows ancient artifacts

showing interlectual structure of improvement by adapting the form of art. The caves preserved the art showing that

they have learned how to create triangular art by carving the stone(similar to the woodcut technique) which would

be widdled with a sharp object such as a knife, bones, or a sharp stone. As for the artifacts, the cave walls were

painted (proof of art) showing ancient animals and how they hunted by creating weapons (also artifacts). So as you

might see, the Blombos caves show artifacts of a higher thinking because they had to use their memory on where

they traveled and where to get the materials to make the artwork, use mathematical thinking when recalling

different things that happened, patterns of structure as well as a form of art.

100%!

i believe the correct answer is: must sculpture be beautiful to be considered art?

the aesthetics represents the exploring of beauty and taste of nature in art, with the creation and appreciation of beauty. having that in mind, i believe the appropriate aesthetic question you could ask about gianlorenzo bernini’s sculpture david is “must sculpture be beautiful to be considered art? ”.