Two liquids were added to each other that results in a different color liquid. jackson said, "we observed a chemical change, because a new color was formed." carsyn said, "it may have been a physical change, if it was only mixing paint colors." who is correct and why? a. carsyn is correct, because only unexpected color changes are chemical changes. you would need other evidence to show a chemical change occurred. b) carsyn is correct, because color change is always a result of a physical change. c) jackson is correct, because color change always indicates a chemical change. d) jackson is correct, because color change means an new substance was formed.

The correct answer is option A. Carsyn is correct, because only unexpected color changes are chemical changes. You would need other evidence to show a chemical change occurred.

The color changes can be a case of chemical changes, but mixing of two colored solution (in this case, paint) can come up with a new color by physical mixing only.

It is observed any unexpected color changes, which means the color change, which cannot be obtained by mixing two existing color denotes the chemical reaction. So, Jackson's statement may or may not be true. So, to determine if it is a chemical change or a physical change some further research should be done.

it would lead to upper respiratory infections and pneumonia.

why many students visually perceive stem as a vapid class?

for many students, however, stem subjects are optically discerned as vapid, tedious, and destitute of authentic-world applications. science and math have always been a major part of the high school curriculum, but many students have disengaged from these subjects because they don’t optically discern that they have any pertinence to the authentic world or students’ daily lives. for them, math and science have become a set of rules, procedures, laws, theorems, and formulas to memorize. some students even develop math apprehensiveness and cerebrate they are incapable of learning higher-level mathematics.

why is stem paramount?

as the u.s. economy changes, the ordinant dictation for stem-capable workers is growing. in may of 2014, the u.s. bureau of labor statistics counted more than 8.3 million stem jobs, which accounted for 6.2 percent of total employment in the cumulated states. that number is expected to perpetuate to increment as u.s. companies grow and innovate to compete in the ecumenical economy. according to the u.s. department of labor, the average salary for all stem jobs is $85,570, which is virtually double the average salary for all jobs.

many people still envision stem professionals as wearing a white lab coat and conducting research in a laboratory. in authenticity, some of the most in-demand stem fields are petroleum engineering, process engineering, and computer engineering. these fields that are experiencing shortages of qualified candidates are additionally among the highest paying, with the average petroleum engineer earning an annual salary of $147,520 in may 2014 according to the u.s. bureau of labor statistics.

in additament, stem subjects edify students valuable skills that are vital for prosperity in all vocations, even those that do not directly require stem erudition. engagement in stem subjects avails students develop quandary-solving, critical mentally conceiving, and leadership skills. these skills are so ecumenical, in fact, that statistics relinquished in the summer of 2013 by the u.s. census bureau designated that about three-quarters of the people with a bachelor’s degree in stem fields are not working in those vocations. many non-stem employers are poaching stem-qualified job candidates because they are more ingenious and collaborative than their non-stem counterparts.

as the ecumenical economy perpetuates to evolve, the desideratum for stem-capable workers will perpetuate to grow. by getting edifiers and students involved in the stem kineticism, an incipient generation of adroit workers will be poised to energize and expand this exhilarating field.

check this over.