Researchers have historically considered the human appendix to be a vestigial structure. what evidence, if true, would best disprove this claim?

The human appendix is ​​a vestigial structure: its original function (digestion of raw vegetable substances) has been lost for a long time.

A vestigial structure is, in evolutionary evolutionary biology, an anatomical structure of the organism of a species whose initial function has been totally or partially lost during evolution.

The uselessness of the vestigial organs remains debated. It is not clear whether these organs are merely relics of old functional organs or whether they have a role, even a discrete one, in the functioning of the organism. From a scientific point of view, it is moreover difficult to declare certain organs as useless, a lack of knowledge being able to be at the origin of a non-comprehension of the role of the organ. Some creationists seize this idea because, according to them, God has given each organism its organs for a specific reason and use.

S.R. Scadding (evolutionist) stated: "As our knowledge has increased, the list of vestigial structures has decreased. Wiedersheim could record about 100 in humans, recent authors usually describe 4 or 5. Even this short list of vestigial structures in humans is debatable. "

On the other hand, one can legitimately think that the acquisition or the conservation of a second function in these vestigial organs is an index of an adaptation of the species and, consequently, of their evolution.

the correct answer is: b. pantala flavescens, because these organisms would have a high level of genetic variation due to sexual reproduction.  

because involves two organisms (parents) whose genetic material combines, sexual reproduction leads to genetic variation in new generations of offspring. the offspring is an unique organism, with new genome, more protected with the higher ability to adapted. this process is fundamental to evolution.

d. changes in climate and historical records

hope this