subject
Biology, 29.12.2019 13:31 brevenb375

Which of the following conclusions could you draw about the cell shown in figure b?

the cell is eukaryotic because it has a nucleus.

the cell is prokaryotic because it does not have a nucleus.

the cell is prokaryotic because it has a nucleus.

the cell is eukaryotic because it does not have a nucleus.

the correct answer is the cell is eukaryotic because it has a nucleus. i figured it out.


Which of the following conclusions could you draw about the cell shown in figure b? the

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 18:30
When does dna replication(make a copy of itself)?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 21.06.2019 22:00
Ry was studying two populations of the same species of lizards. one population lived on an island and the other lived on the mainland. both populations were affected by a hurricane that hit the island and the mainland with equal force. a year later, henry was testing the gene frequency and saw a decrease in genetic variation in the island species, but not in the mainland species. which best describes a conclusion he might have reached? gene flow greatly affects small populations, but large populations can recover. genetic drift greatly affects small populations, but large populations can recover. gene flow greatly affects large populations, but small populations can recover. genetic drift greatly affects large populations, but small populations can recover.
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 00:00
How does a lytic infection differ from a lysogenic infection?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 00:30
On a recent expedition to a remote region of northern canada, scientists uncovered skeletal remains from about 100,000 years ago. surprisingly, all the skeletal remains, which included many species from differing biological families and spanned about two thousand years, showed evidence of experiencing temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees fahrenheit (or 538 degrees celsius). which of the following, if true, best explains the apparent paradox between the cold environment and the evidence of the bones experiencing hot temperatures? (a) chemical changes that naturally occur during the process of decay in only one north canadian species produce the same evidence of the species' skeletons being exposed to hot temperatures as the expedition scientists found. (b) a little over 103,000 years ago, a large fire is known to have occurred in northern canada. (c) strong evidence exists that as early as 70,000 years ago, homo sapiens around the world relied heavily on fire to cook animals. (d) in the same expedition and in roughly the same layer of excavation, scientists found rudimentary wood cutting and hunting tools used by early humans.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following conclusions could you draw about the cell shown in figure b?

the...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362