Aprosecuting attorney was given the forensic lab results from the blood-typing activity. she found that the crime-scene blood matched the blood type of one of the suspects’ blood. the prosecutor told the jurors that the crime-scene evidence blood matched the defendant’s blood type. she further stated that this evidence proved that the sus- pect was indeed the perpetrator of the crime.

you are the defendant’s attorney. how would you respond to the prosecutor’s argument that because the blood types matched, then the defendant is proven to be guilty of the crime?

The blood type matching is a way too broad way to prosecute a suspect since there are about 8 universal blood groups in total. I would demand a DNA test.

Explanation:

prophase: we can observe the chromosomes to coil up and condense. they become visible. nuclear membrane and envelope disintigrate.s

metaphase: chromosomes align at the center, the metaphase plate. spindle fibers attach to centromeres of the sister chromatids. they meet at kinetochores.

anaphase: sister chromatids are pulled towards each opposing centromere, set on different poles.

telophase: chromosomes are now clustered up only on either sides of the cell. nuclear membranes reform, and a new cell wall forms along the cell plate. this will lead to cytokinesis, the process that divides the cell membrane and forms the cell wall.