Biological systematics and ethnoscience differ in what way? ethnoscience and systemics both attempt to examine how all societies classify the world the same. ethnoscience attempts to understand how people understand the world and plant systematics attempts to use classification to document evolutionary relationships between organisims. ethnoscience attempts to model cognitive evolution, whereas biological systematics attempts to trace cultural variation. biological systematics focuses on all organisms, and ethnoscience only studies plants.

Ethnoscience attempts to understand how people understand the world and plant systematics attempts to use classification to document evolutionary relationships between organisims

Explanation:

Ethnoscience is a study about how people see the world around them. This study shows how different people understand the nature and life under the influence of different cultures.

On the other hand, systematics shows relationships among living things through a certain period of time. Those relationships are graphically represented by phylogenetic trees or cladograms.

a fossil fuel is a fuel formed by natural processes, such as anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms, containing energy originating in ancient photosynthesis.[1] the age of the organisms and their resulting fossil fuels is typically millions of years, and sometimes exceeds 650 million years.[2] fossil fuels contain high percentages of carbon and include petroleum, coal, and natural gas.[3] other commonly used derivatives include kerosene and propane. fossil fuels range from volatile materials with low carbon to hydrogen ratios like methane, to liquids like petroleum, to nonvolatile materials composed of almost pure carbon, like anthracite coal. methane can be found in hydrocarbon fields either alone, associated with oil, or in the form of methane clathrates.

the theory that fossil fuels formed from the fossilized remains of dead plants by exposure to heat and pressure in the earth's crust over millions of years was first introduced by andreas libavius "in his 1597 alchemia [alchymia]" and later by mikhail lomonosov "as early as 1757 and certainly by 1763".[4] the first use of the term "fossil fuel" was by the german chemist caspar neumann, in english translation in 1759.[5]

in 2017 the world's primary energy sources consisted of petroleum (34%), coal (28%), natural gas (23%), amounting to an 85% share for fossil fuels in primary energy consumption in the world.[6] non-fossil sources in 2006 included nuclear (8.5%), hydroelectric (6.3%), and others (geothermal, solar, tidal, wind, wood, waste) amounting to 0.9%.[7] world energy consumption was growing at about 2.3% per year. in 2015 about 18% of worldwide consumption was from renewable sources.[8]