Biology, 12.09.2019 16:10 brenna209

What are two ways scientists can describe the quality of measurements

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: lilloser

To describe a scientist as skeptical means that they question both existing ideas and new hypotheses. Skepticism is considered a valuably quality in a scientist because they must be able to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a hypothesis.

Answer from: gmanbom

Precision and validity of the measurement are the two ways scientists can describe the quality of measurements.

Explanation:

The quality of the measurement from time innumerable is based on quantity and magnitude. The scientists describe the quality of the measurements by comparing the existing ideas and new hypotheses.

Quality of measurements can be done by precision and validity of the measurement. Measurements are derived by performing calculations, applications to derive accuracy and precision towards attaining the quality of measurement.

Answer from: Quest

1.fossils 2.analogous organs 3.homologous organs

Answer from: Quest

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

Another question on Biology

Biology, 21.06.2019 20:30

Which of the following is a common danger of commercial fishing?

Answers: 1

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 00:30

On a recent expedition to a remote region of northern canada, scientists uncovered skeletal remains from about 100,000 years ago. surprisingly, all the skeletal remains, which included many species from differing biological families and spanned about two thousand years, showed evidence of experiencing temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees fahrenheit (or 538 degrees celsius). which of the following, if true, best explains the apparent paradox between the cold environment and the evidence of the bones experiencing hot temperatures? (a) chemical changes that naturally occur during the process of decay in only one north canadian species produce the same evidence of the species' skeletons being exposed to hot temperatures as the expedition scientists found. (b) a little over 103,000 years ago, a large fire is known to have occurred in northern canada. (c) strong evidence exists that as early as 70,000 years ago, homo sapiens around the world relied heavily on fire to cook animals. (d) in the same expedition and in roughly the same layer of excavation, scientists found rudimentary wood cutting and hunting tools used by early humans.

Answers: 3

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 08:00

What are the student's observations and inferences before he starts his investigation?

Answers: 3

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 15:00

Which of the following must be true for a fossil organism to be useful as an index fossil? a. the fossil organism must be widespread geographically. b. the fossil organism must be abundant. c. the fossil organism must be limited to a short span of geologic time. d. all of the above.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

What are two ways scientists can describe the quality of measurements...

Questions