In the following conversation, which group discussion technique does emily
most clearly show?
han:
even though (the author of the article is saying that the
radiation hasn't made japan's exported food dangerous to
eat, he's pulling out all the stops to make it seem as if
japan really messed things up, even though there's proof
the disaster couldn't be prevented.
emily:
so you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
a. challenging established ideas
o
b. assessing the claims of your discussion partner
o
c. using evidence to support your conclusions
o
d. using parallel structure and audience appeals

Option B, Assessing the claims of your discussion partner

Explanation:

Emily has asked the discussion partner a question that raise doubts on their statements on one hand and on the other hand shows the interpersonal skill of Emily to analyse the facts and figures.

She has tried to get the answer of her doubts from her discussion partner itself without any direct contradicting or questioning.

Option B is correct

one part of the electromagnetic spectrum that arrives on earth as solar radiation from the sun is the visible spectrum. wavelengths of the visible spectrum combine to form what we refer to as

answer - d) ultraviolet radiation.

violet /   380–450 nm / 668–789 thz

violet is number 1 in the chart of visible light.

ok yes, but what is the question? as soon as you ask the actual question i will answer it. : )