Farmer Scott is one of the best farmers in town. During the middle of the corn growing season, Farmer Scott had to travel out of town for two weeks, and he left his acres of corn plants alone with no chemicals or other protection. In terms of succession, which of these best describes what Framer Scott returned to after the two weeks? Farmer Scott is one of the best farmers in town. During the middle of the corn growing season, Farmer Scott had to travel out of town for two weeks, and he left his acres of corn plants alone with no chemicals or other protection. In terms of succession, which of these best describes what Framer Scott returned to after the two weeks?

The options

A) Small weeds began to grow and develop.

B) There was no distinct change in the corn fields.

C) All of the corn died due to a rampant corn disease.

D) The corn mutated to form a new species of vegetable

The CORRECT ANSWER IS A)

A) Small weeds began to grow and develop.

Explanation:

There is a very high tendency for Farmer Scott to observe the small weeds that had started to sprung up and continued to grow while he was away for some time in his corn field. The field was kept during those times without any use of the necessary protection methods such as pesticides or insecticides. The weeds still grew at the farm without weed clearing for two whole weeks, which must have resulted in the observed raise in growth. The weeds will compete with the corn plants for soil nutrients as the weeds will absorb a greater portion of soil nutrients than the corn plants. It results in shortage of nutrients for the corn.

Therefore, the right option is A)

Small weeds began to grow and develop.

the "dirty dozen" chemicals banned in an international treaty are formally known as persistent organic pollutants, or pops. the united nations environment program provided this background on what they are and what they can do to humans and wildlife.

i hope this

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."