Mr. Cortez had a good conversation about the fairness of restitution and retribution with 9-year-old Sherrod. The next day, Sherrod still thought retribution was the fairest. Scientific study shows us that this MOST likely means that talking about moral values with children .

will not bring about immediate change

Explanation:

Restitution can be explained as the process of making up for damages or harm, and/or restoring or returning what is taking from someone back to him/her, while Retribution is simply the act of revenge.

In a simple term, restitution is restoring what was lost, while retribution is hurting the transgressor. This means that restitution does not involve the act of hurting other people

It has been discovered that when group of children were thought about restitution and retribution, half will go for restitution why others will go for retribution.  This simply means that talking about morals with children will not be immediately effective, but a thing of gradual. this because the children brains are still developing.

it also supports my hypothesis. if you rest first you can squeeze the clothespin more times. from the data i collected the average of the eight people concluded exercise makes your muscles more fatigued and less able to squeeze the clothespin compared to resting before squeezing.