Darwin’s comments about eyes are often used as evidence against evolution by natural selection, but only because his quotes are taken out of context. Darwin did not think that the possibility that eyes evolved through natural selection was actually "absurd in the highest degree." What was the basis of his logical argument and what evidence do we have to support it?

Explanation:

Darwin proposed the theory of evolution and also the mechanism of how the species evolved that is through natural selection.

He produced so many evidence which supported his hypothesis and one of them was that he tried to study the evolution of the eye and observed that the there are so many varieties of an eye in the different organism which is the result of the natural selection.

But his statement in his book represented in the paragraph showed that looking at the eye of organism he was puzzled and questioned himself about evolution.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

there’s no image attached but i can if you want: )