subject
Biology, 06.05.2020 03:40 flore9584

Which of the following best describes the difference between circumstantial evidence and direct evidence?

Direct evidence can lead to the conviction of a suspect, while circumstantial evidence cannot.

Direct evidence is not admissible in court; however, circumstantial evidence is admissible with approval of a judge.

Direct evidence is used to imply a fact, while circumstantial evidence proves and alleged fact.

Direct evidence proves an alleged fact, while circumstantial evidence is used to imply a fact.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 01:30
Compare the composition of the moon's surface with the composition of the earth's surface.
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 03:50
During the winter, this species of fox has white fur, but in the summer, it has brown fur. what environmental change may have lead to this fox's fur color? snow cover increase in sun's brightness volcanic eruption global warming
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:30
Approximately what portion of the foods that we eat have been genetically modified in some way? a.fewer than 10% b.about 50% c.nearly 100%
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:00
Which of these is not a nucleotide base found in dna?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following best describes the difference between circumstantial evidence and direct evid...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 19:50
question
History, 12.01.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 19:50
question
Chemistry, 12.01.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 19:50
Questions on the website: 13722367