Why does it matter if fossils are treated like rocks or minerals? Describe how defining fossils as rocks or minerals impact things like monetary value, access to specimens for research, and ownership rights. Which side do you think has the stronger case - bones or minerals? Why?

explanation:

idk

succession returns a disturbed

ecosystem to a more stable state. this is also classified into two (2) types:

primary succession and secondary succession. the primary succession arises when

a new land is transformed and a bare rock has been exposed providing an environment

that can be occupied for the first time. while, secondary succession occurs

when a previously occupied environment was disturbed that kills much of all its

community

explanation:

silty loam

hope this