The gluten-free diet was originally intended for people with celiac disease, but it's now become a new fad diet for the general population. Many people state that gluten-free diets are beneficial for people who aren't sensitive to gluten, while others suggest that there's no benefit. Use credible resources to evaluate the argument yourself. Do you think there's sufficient scientific evidence to support the use of a gluten-free diet in people who aren't sensitive to gluten? Provide evidence that supports your argument.

hey love! so i actually have celiac so i know a lot about this haha! hope this helps!!

Following a gluten-free diet in the absence of celiac disease may be detrimental to health. Nutritional deficiences: Avoiding foods that contain gluten can lead to deficiencies in essential nutrients, including iron, calcium, fiber, folate, thiamin, riboflavin, and niacin.

Explanation:

In recent years, the gluten-free diet has become more of a fad than a medical necessity. ... The study concluded that more gluten consumption is associated with a lower risk of heart disease, suggesting that those who do not suffer from celiac disease or non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity should not avoid gluten. Though many health professionals suggest otherwise, it's safe to follow a gluten-free diet — even for people who don't necessarily need to do so. Cutting out wheat and other gluten-containing grains or products will not cause adverse health effects — as long as these products are replaced with nutritious foods.

Explanation:

There’s no benefit to a gluten-free diet for people who aren’t sensitive to gluten. Many websites state benefits of a gluten-free diet. These benefits range from weight loss to improved heart health. None of these sites backed up their claims with scientific research. More credible sites consistently state that there’s no scientific research to back up these claims. Right now, there’s no evidence that supports the benefits of a gluten-free diet in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten.