subject
Biology, 14.07.2020 20:01 josephbig9

A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chain are interfering with larvae development. A climate scientist believes that a change in water temperature is depleting food sources from the water. Why are both of these options valid scientific hypothesis? A. Scientists with different educational can come to different interpretations of the same data. B. No educated guess can be considered a valid hypothesis since hypotheses are made before data collection. C. Scientific debate is always continuing and the scientific community never discards a hypothesis. D. Both scientists underwent the same training and, therefore, have equally valid hypotheses.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:10
Name the organs of humanelemintary canal.
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 04:50
Consider the classification levels of a human. eukarya ,animalia ,chordata ,mammalia ,primates, hominidae ,homo ,sapiens .which is the most specific taxonomic level in the classification system above? a sapiens b homo c hominidae d primates
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:20
The activity of the modern sample is 1.10 bq . how long does that measurement take?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 12:00
What are the pros and cons of quadrat sampling?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chai...
Questions
question
History, 16.10.2020 17:01
question
English, 16.10.2020 17:01
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 17:01
Questions on the website: 13722360