1. How was the Flowing Water Model similar to flowing water on Earth? I1 How was the Flowing Water Model similar to flowing water on Earth?

2. How was the Flowing Water Model different than

flowing water on Earth?

3. How I would change the Flowing Water Model to make it more like the actual geologic process on Earth?

i believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. the scientists need to look at the   validity of data, claims, hypotheses, and observations before  developing an argument. they base their arguments on facts that are present and they make sure they have proofs. 

explanation:

because they are eaten by the frog and the frog getseaten by the snake and the snake by the eagle

the potatoes have high sugar concentrations and although these potatoes were different we could seethe effects that their sugar concentrations had in different environments. for example, the potatoes in sample a, were placed in pure water. this created a hypertonic environment and caused the potatoes to draw in water from its surroundings. we saw the opposite happen with the potatoes in sample b when placed in the sodium chloride solution. the potatoes in this case were in a hypotonic solution and therefore lost water to their surroundings.