Jonathan and Molly performed a similar experiment, except in their lab they tested a slurry of crackers. Their results showed that crackers contain proteins and lipids. When they checked the food label on the cracker box, they were surprised to find that protein and fat were not listed. No other groups in their class have results that show protein and lipids present in the sample. Describe at least one factor that could have contributed to their erroneous results.

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

the answer is sex-linked recessive.

yeytyryyeyeyeyeyeeyeyey6