The graph on the left shows the total supply and consumption of forests when the consumption rate and population growth rate are both low. The
graph on the right shows biodiversity under the same conditions.
Which conclusion do the graphs support?

A

Explanation:

The number of different species in a particular habitat is what is what makes up the biodiversity in such habitat. The more varied the species are, the higher the biodiversity.

There are factors that could lead to a decline in the biodiversity level of an habitat which is illustrated by the two graphs above. One of such factors is over exploration of a forest.

The graph shows that as consumption of lumber increases at a faster rate compared to how forest is replenished, the amount of lumber available for supply also reduces. As this goes on, biodiversity keeps declining.

In summary, we can say that:

"When forests are cut down faster than they can be replenished, biodiversity quickly decreases."

Deforestation leads to loss of biodiversity.

Explanation:

small, big, or no change could occur in the phenotype. it could cause something as simple as a cats ears to curl backwards or something as frighting as death. it could also occur in the protien-coding area and have an effect on that but no effect on the amino acids. what has to occur is a changing in the hox gene or the control gene.

i won't lie i don't know so go online and ask google thats what i do