Investigator Sheer is testifying about DNA evidence she found at the crime scene that matches the suspect on trial. The prosecutor asks Investigator Sheer to explain her conclusion that the DNA samples matched. What would be a good explanation for her to give to the jury?

That at least 10 different points on the two samples matched
That the DNA profile matches someone with the suspect's hair color and skin tone
That she found one point that matched on the two DNA samples
That the DNA samples showed no clear points in common

Answer ! in your opinion, what are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our ecosystem? respond to this question in claim, evidence, reasoning format. 1. make your claim (i are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our 2. follow the claim with 3 pieces of evidence. evidence may be taken from the reading, the videos, previous lessons, or googled answers. site sources, too. 3. use reasoning to explain why you chose your evidence.

Which statements best describe the differences or similarities between a comparative investigation and an experimental investigation? check all that apply. experimental investigations are best for showing cause-and-effect relationships, while comparative investigations do not necessarily show this type of relationship. comparative investigations are often impractical and unrealistic, while experimental investigations are the most practical and realistic kinds of investigations. comparative investigations allow for the use of a wide range of variables but do not have a control group, while experimental investigations involve variables that can be controlled. both experimental investigations and comparative investigations are designed to answer scientific questions. both experimental investigations and comparative investigations focus on making observations rather than collecting new data.

Witch theory suggests all living things are made up of cell or cells