What do you think accounts for the higher risk of earthquakes in Los Angeles than in Chicago?

Los Angeles, California, rests on a major (and active) fault line known as the San Andreas Fault. It's the line between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates, and more seismic activity is measured daily than on the New Madrid Fault, which runs through New Madrid, Missouri, and around the mid-west. Chicago is still at risk, of course, but not nearly as much, given the small activity of the fault line.

depends where

on my head

yes

on my legs

yes

on my

arms

yesh

the answer is tropical areas. the tropical areas obtain more

radiant energy from the sun than they lose to space through terrestrial

radiation, and vice versa for polar areas. earth has an energy remaining in the

tropics and an energy scarcity for the polar areas.

explanation: