Which of the following best explains why using more than one assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness gives a better picture of fitness level? a. no individual cardiorespiratory fitness test is accurate. b. heart and lung fitness must be assessed separately. c. using more than one assessment provides a more complete picture of an individual's fitness level. d. all of the above

The correct answer is option C.

Explanation:

Cardiorespiratory fitness refers to a medical term, which is used to illustrate the tendency of an individual's body to mediate the essential oxygen required towards the muscles and the tendency of the muscles to captivate the provided oxygen. There are numerous ways to evaluate the cardiorespiratory fitness of an individual like the Bruce protocol treadmill test, the VO2 max testing, and the bleep or the beep test.  

The VO2 max test is considered to be the most common test of cardiorespiratory fitness. It determines the function of the lungs, heart, and the blood to conduct oxygen towards the effective muscles, and predicts the application of oxygen by the muscles at the time of training.  

However, the most suitable way to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness is to use an amalgamation of tests as this provides an entire image of the fitness level of the body of an individual.  

i love you and i play fortnite add me rod0107

picture a world where computers are building made-to-order personalized robotic arms and synthetic organs, drones are circulating above mars! due to the rapid growth of technology, the future has never been more unpredictable, and it presents a huge challenge in education: we are teaching students how to work in a future that we have never been unsure of. it is widely predicted that in eight years’ time, there will be more jobs in the fields of science, mathematics, technology and engineering than in any other discipline. and, as the technology continues to develop, it will soon become clear that addressing social problems will involve more innovative thinking, and analytical and technical knowledge than ever before. undeniably, there are no subjects that encourage innovative and creative thinking, deep thought, problem solving and independence more than the stem subjects. while it is widely commented on that there is a need to reimagine the ways stem subjects are taught in schools by embracing a more interactive and innovative approach to appeal to more students, it should come as no surprise that some of the most reputable educational organizations in the world are already implementing changes to embrace stem. harvard, for example, announced in 2014 that they were increasing their computer science faculty by over 50% and has since introduced computer science as a core subject for all freshmen. the urgency of supporting stem subjects at a young age is becoming more relevant than ever, as adopting a keen interest in the curricula needs to happen early. however, beyond the age issue is one of gender.

let me know if you need more