The salivation of dogs in pavlov’s experiments was significant because it

The salivation was significant because it demonstrated the ability to learn to anticipate future events as a survival advantage.

Explanation:

Pavlov wanted to clarify how conditioned reflexes were acquired. Dogs naturally salivate for food; Pavlov thus called the correlation between the unconditioned stimulus (food) and the unconditioned response (salivation) an unconditioned reflex. On the other hand, when a stimulus does not elicit any response, it is called a neutral stimulus (bell sound).

Pavlov's experiment was to associate an unconditioned stimulus (food) with the presentation of a neutral stimulus (bell sound).

After repeating this association of stimuli, he found that the dog learned to salivate before the stimulus that previously did not elicit any (neutral) response even in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus (food). This salivation was significant because it demonstrated the ability to learn to anticipate future events as a survival advantage.

its been noted for the past decade or so that there is some (approximately 5% to 7%) shrinkage in the brains of people who have schizophrenia, most notably in the gray matter, which is an important part structures in the brain’s amygdala, hippocampus and parahippocampus, which are all involved in memory storage and retrieval memory storage and retrieval.

explanation:

ive read articles

i believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. the scientists need to look at the   validity of data, claims, hypotheses, and observations before  developing an argument. they base their arguments on facts that are present and they make sure they have proofs. 

explanation: