subject
Biology, 30.08.2021 21:50 mella98

What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? * A. There would be no difference since decomposition is an abiotic factor and cycling of nutrients would still occur.
B. The energy and nutrients required for life would be stuck and could not be cycled, thus life would cease.
C. There is no need for bacteria since they do not play any role in biogeochemical cycles, just plants and animals..
D. No one would know.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 15:30
What are four key elements of the study of economics?
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 21.06.2019 22:00
Consider darwin's first writings on the theory of natural selection. an important point of darwin's essay on the principle of population, written in 1798, was a peer's observation that in nature plants and animals produce far more offspring than can survive, this observation can be attributed to a) charles lyell. b) thomas malthus. c) jean-baptiste lamarck. d) johann friedrich meckel.
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 01:30
The reactions that occur in the ribosome, where amino acids are combined to form proteins are anabolic or catabolic?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 14:00
What chemical speeds up the process of decomposition in dead organisms are exposed to it? nitrogen oxygen hydrogen chlorine
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? * A. There...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 03:20
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 03:20
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 03:20
question
Biology, 19.05.2020 03:20
question
Business, 19.05.2020 03:20
Questions on the website: 13722360