Why were health care reform activists like dr. margaret flowers angry with sen. baucus during the committee hearings? do you feel their protests were justified? what could sen. baucus have done differently? what might have been the outcome?

Activists felt that their calls for a single-payer system were not being taken seriously and the need for hearings on the subject were being downplayed. This is justified because, at the very least, there could have been debate on the subject instead of a complete shutting-out of their wishes. Sen. Baucus could have, at the very least, called for a committee hearing on the subject and questioned advocates of the concept about the pros and cons of a single-payer system, instead of completely downplaying the idea out-of-hand. This could have led to an increase in interest in the idea and maybe even bringing some of the ideas into the current health-care system.

Ifound this on google “aristotle (384–322 bc) in western scientific taxonomy the greek philosopher aristotle was the first to classify all living things, and some of his groups are still used today, like the vertebrates and invertebrates, which he called animals with blood and without blood.” i hope this you for what your looking for.