Mr. miller's biology class is studying cellular respiration. to model cellular respiration, they set up an experiment containing four flasks. each flask is the same size and are stoppered and placed under a floodlight. each flask also contains 200 ml of h20 and 2 ml of bromothymol blue. bromothymol blue is a chemical indicator solution that changes color from blue to yellow in the presence of co2. the students then place a plant and/or fish into each flask (except for flask #4 which is the control group) according to the table above. which flask(s) will turn yellow and why?

Flask 2  

Explanation: the fish produce CO2 as a product of cellular respiration.

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."