Genetically-modified organisms (gmos) are currently being developed for agriculture. currently commercialized gm crops in the u. s. include soy (94%), cotton (90%), canola (90%), sugar beets (95%), corn (88%), and hawaiian papaya (more than 50%). the use of gmo crops can reduce agricultural costs to farmers and provide greater crop-yields, possibly with issues of food shortages. although this sounds great, there is still a lot of controversy around the use of gmos. which of these is a valid argument on why we should not use gmos in our food?
a) gmos do not have any nutritional value
b) gmo crops are always more expensive to buy
c) gmo crops are invasive and take over the habitat of local crops
d) there is not enough research on long-term effects of eating gmos

The main argument against GMOs is there is not enough research on long-term effects of eating GMOs. Many people are afraid that there might be long-term consequences of eating food that has been "altered." D

not sure if this is what you'r looking for eubacteria and archaebacteria

answer: grassland biomes are closer to the equator and receive more rain.

grasslands are biomes that are dominated by grasses rather shrubs and trees. savanna are biomes that exhibit grasses, shrubs and small tree as vegetation. grasslands are located near the equator of the earth. these are found in north america. savanna biomes are found in africa, south america, australia and india. grassland exhibit moderate climatic conditions, it receives   amount of rainfall higher than savanna.   therefore, savanna exhibit dry and hot climatic conditions.