What was the difference between darwin and lamarck? lamarak was able to explain evolution with evidence something darwin did not dothe idea of mutations was understood by both but lamarck was able to prove itdarwin was able to explain evolution with evidence something lamarck did not dothe idea of mutations was understood by both but darwin was able prove it

The answer is the idea of mutations was understood by both but Lamarck was able to prove it.

What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

(Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do!)

The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it.

The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it.

Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do

The First one is correct

This is the most closely resembles the model. 

Characteristic expected of mineral from lava at earth's surface

phaneritic textures in which phaner means visible so phaneritic textures are standard of impertinent volcanic rocks. these rocks crystallized gradually under the surface of earth. when the magma cools deliberately then the ores have chance to develop and produce long crystals.