subject
Business, 29.06.2019 08:30 desi0322

Connor was employed by tabor city bank. he left the company voluntarily after he ended a personal relationship with laura, the branch manager, who was his boss. when a prospective employer contacted the bank for a reference, laura told him that connor had been fired for misconduct. connor did not get the job. in this case, connor has a cause of action for publication in a false light defamation public disclosure of private facts intrusion into seclusion

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
Mark knopf is an auditor who has been asked to provide an audit and financial statement certification for a company that is going public on the new york stock exchange. knopf wants to know his personal liability if the company provides him with inaccurate or false information. which of the following sources of law will him answer that question? a. the city ordinances where the company headquarters is located. b. the state constitution of the state where the company is incorporated. c. code of federal regulations. d. all of the above
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30
Considered alone, which of the following would increase a company's current ratio? a. an increase in net fixed assets.b. an increase in accrued liabilities.c. an increase in notes payable.d. an increase in accounts receivable.e. an increase in accounts payable.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 21:00
Acompany recently announced that it would be going public. the usual suspects, morgan stanley, jpmorgan chase, and goldman sachs will be the lead underwriters. the value of the company has been estimated to range from a low of $5billion to a high of $100billion, with $45billion being the most likely value. if there is a 20% chance that the price will be at the low end, a 10% chance that the price will be at the high end, and a 70% chance that the price will be in the middle, what value should the owner expect the company to price at?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Connor was employed by tabor city bank. he left the company voluntarily after he ended a personal re...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Biology, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 22:01
Questions on the website: 13722367