Business, 24.06.2019 16:00 davidoj13

After extensive negotiations, representatives for an automobile manufacturer and a tire maker orally agreed on the specifications for a supply of tires. the lawyer for the car manufacturer then drafted a written agreement and sent it to the tire maker's lawyer, who modified the draft and sent it back to the car manufacturer. this writing was signed by both parties. the tire maker now brings an action for breach of contract against the car manufacturer seeking damages. the car manufacturer attempts to introduce the testimony of its chief negotiator describing the oral agreement with the tire maker representatives that the tires would meet certain requirements of the car models. the tire maker objects, arguing that the parol evidence rule bars admission of this testimony. which of the following is the best argument supporting admission of the testimony? a the memorandum signed by the parties was not a complete integration of their agreement. b the parol evidence rule does not bar evidence interpreting a written agreement. c the car manufacturer detrimentally relied on the oral agreement in signing the memorandum. d the parol evidence rule does not exclude misrepresentations.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 01:00

Paar corporation bought 100 percent of kimmel, inc., on january 1, 2012. on that date, paarâ€™s equipment (10-year life) has a book value of $420,000 but a fair value of $520,000. kimmel has equipment (10-year life) with a book value of $272,000 but a fair value of $400,000. paar uses the equity method to record its investment in kimmel. on december 31, 2014, paar has equipment with a book value of $294,000 but a fair value of $445,200. kimmel has equipment with a book value of $190,400 but a fair value of $357,000. the consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 is $574,000. what would be the impact on consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 if the parent had applied the initial value method rather than the equity method? the balance in the consolidated equipment account cannot be determined for the initial value method using the information given. the consolidated equipment account would have a higher reported balance. the consolidated equipment account would have a lower reported balance. no effect: the method the parent uses is for internal reporting purposes only and has no impact on consolidated totals.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 13:10

Lindor inc.'s $100 par value preferred stock pays a dividend fixed at 8% of par. to earn 12% on an investment in this stock, you need to purchase the shares at a per share price of

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 24.06.2019 03:30

When tua changed from an individual to a family health insurance plan, his monthly payments increased from $400 to $1000. how much more per year does tua pay to have a family health plan instead of an individual plan?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 24.06.2019 05:20

Which best describes the nature of cause and effect in the context of the business cycle?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

After extensive negotiations, representatives for an automobile manufacturer and a tire maker orally...

Questions