Del gato clinic deposits all cash receipts on the day when they are received and it makes all cash payments by check. at the close of business on june 30, 2015, its cash account shows a(n) $16,124 debit balance. del gato clinic’s june 30 bank statement shows $16,206 on deposit in the bank. a. outstanding checks as of june 30 total $3,091.b. the june 30 bank statement included a $45 debit memorandum for bank services. c.check no. 919, listed with the canceled checks, was correctly drawn for $689 in payment of a utility bill on june 15. del gato clinic mistakenly recorded it with a debit to utilities expense and a credit to cash in the amount of $698.d. the june 30 cash receipts of $2,973 were placed in the bank’s night depository after banking hours and were not recorded on the june 30 bank statement. prepare a bank reconciliation for del gato clinic using the above information:

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.