subject
Business, 16.07.2019 02:10 pennstatealum

Charles robison, an employee of west star transportation, inc., was ordered to cover an unevenly loaded flatbed trailer with a 150-pound tarpaulin (a water-proof cloth). the load included uncrated equipment and pallet crates of different heights, about thirteen feet off the ground at its highest point. while standing on the load, manipulating the tarpaulin without safety equipment or assistance, robison fell and sustained a traumatic head injury. he filed a suit against west star to recover for his injury. was west star “negligent in failing to provide a reasonably safe place to work,” as robison claimed? g

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:00
Beagle autos is known for its affordable and reliable brand of consumer vehicles. because its shareholders expect to see an improved rate of growth in the coming years, beagle's executives have decided to diversify the company's range of products so that at least 40 percent of the firm's revenue is generated by new business units. however, the company's resources, capabilities, and competencies are limited to producing other forms of motorized vehicles, such as motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles (atvs). which type of corporate diversification strategy should beagle pursue?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 09:40
When providing the square footage of a property for sale, the salesperson should disclose what?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 11:50
Andrew owns a store in polk county. his trade extends throughout river city, but not beyond the county limits. he sells his store to betty and, as part of the transaction, agrees not to engage in the same business anywhere in river city for a period of five years. a. the time restraint is likely reasonable. b. the geographic restraint is likely reasonable. c. the agreement likely violates antitrust laws and the provision is not enforceable. d. both (a) and (b).
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:00
Two firms, a and b, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution emitted into the air. the government gives each firm 40 pollution permits, which it can either use or sell to the other firm. it costs firm a $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air, and it costs firm b $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. after the two firms buy or sell pollution permits from each other, we would expect that firm a will emit a. 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 20 fewer tons of pollution into the air. b. 20 more tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air. c. 50 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 50 fewer tons of pollution into the air. d. 20 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Charles robison, an employee of west star transportation, inc., was ordered to cover an unevenly loa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2022 09:50
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2022 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367