William tells carol that he paid $150,000 for his farm in 2008 and that he believes it is worth twice that at the present time. relying upon these statements, carol buys the farm from william for $225,000. william did pay $150,000 for the farm in 2008, but its value has increased only slightly, and it is presently not worth $300,000. on discovering this, carol offers to reconvey the farm to william and sues for the return of her $225,000. result? modify the facts by assuming that william had paid $100,000 for the property in 2008. what is the result?