Yuki (age 45 at year-end) has been contributing to a traditional ira for years (all deductible contributions), and her ira is now worth $44,000. she is trying to decide whether she should roll over her traditional ira into a roth ira. her current marginal tax rate is 25 percent. she plans to withdraw the entire balance of the account in 20 years and she expects to earn a before-tax rate of return of 5.4 percent on her retirement accounts and a 4.4 percent after-tax rate of return on all investments outside of her retirement accounts. for each of the following alternative scenarios, indicate how much more or less yuki will accumulate after taxes in 20 years if she rolls over her traditional ira into a roth ira. be sure to include the opportunity cost of having to pay taxes on the rollover. a. when she withdraws the retirement funds in 20 years, she expects her marginal tax rate to be 35 percent. accumulation if she rolls over traditional into roth ira. b. when she withdraws the retirement funds in 20 years, she expects her marginal tax rate to be 20 percent. accumulation if she rolls over traditional into roth ira. c. assume the same facts as in part (b), except that she earns a 3.4 percent after-tax rate of return on investments outside of the retirement accounts. accumulation if she rolls over traditional into roth ira.

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.