An electrical engineer designed an electronic game. the engineer entered into a licensing agreement with a toy company under which the toy company agreed to manufacture the game according to the engineer's specifications and to market it and pay a royalty to the engineer. a gamer, whose parents had purchased the game for her, was injured while playing the game. the gamer recovered a judgment against the toy company on the basis of a finding that the game was defective because of the engineer's improper design. in a claim for indemnity against the engineer, will the toy company prevail? a. yes, because as between the engineer and the toy company, the engineer was responsible for the design of the game. b. yes, because the toy company and the engineer were joint tortfeasors. c. no, because the toy company, as the manufacturer, was strictly liable to the gamer. d. no, because the toy company could have discovered that defect in the design of the game by reasonable inspection