subject
Business, 17.09.2019 20:20 iamjenng5028

Noeleen auto mall, ltd. recently completed an initial public offering (ipo) for $23,000,000 by listing its common shares on the new york stock exchange. prior to its ipo, noeleen was a privately held family business. as a public company, noeleen faced increased reporting requirements, particularly those sanctioned by the securities and exchange commission (sec). noeleen'scontroller, donald lierni, was surprised to learn that a form10-q was required to satisfy the company's first-quarter filing requirements with the sec. lierni lacked sufficient time to develop the "actual" numbers needed to prepare thereport, meaning that he needed to make significant estimates before the 10-q filing due date. from the list ofpotential issues a. through c.,identify which are applicable issues and select the relevant components of the conceptual framework of accounting. (all potential issues may not be applicable and all issues may not have two relevant components. if a box is not used in the table leave the box empty.)a. noeleen's controller, donald lierni, was surprised to learn that a form 10-q was required to satisfy the company's first quarter filing requirements with the sec. lierni was concerned that there is insufficient time to develop the"actual" numbers needed to prepare the report. the 10-q required that significant estimates had to be made before the filing due date. b.noeleen created a separate legal entity to handle its autofinancing, benedict arnold credit company, during the same year it went public. the separate entity is not consolidated with the primary financial statements. lierni decided to keep this entity off balance sheet and did not see any need for disclosure ofnoeleen's relationship with benedict arnold credit company. c.noeleen auto mall, ltd. recently completed an initial public offering (ipo) for$23,000,000 by listing its common shares on the new york stock exchange.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 00:00
Alandlord rented an art studio to an artist. under the terms of the signed, written, two-year lease, the artist agreed to pay the landlord $1,000 per month and to assume responsibility for all necessary repairs. after the first year of the lease, the artist assigned the balance of his lease to a sculptor. the landlord approved the sculptor as a tenant and accepted two rent payments from her, and then the landlord sold the building to an investor. the sculptor had made two payments to the investor when an electrical fire broke out in the studio, injuring the sculptor. the fire was caused by faulty wiring. the landlord was aware that there was a dangerous wiring problem when he leased the property to the artist. but when the landlord discovered how costly repairs would be, he decided it would be more profitable to sell the property than to repair it. the problem was not easily discoverable by anyone other than an expert electrician, and the landlord did not tell the artist, the sculptor, or the investor about the problem. the sculptor sues to recover damages for her injuries. from whom can the sculptor recover?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:20
The assumptions of the production order quantity model are met in a situation where annual demand is 3650 units, setup cost is $50, holding cost is $12 per unit per year, the daily demand rate is 10 and the daily production rate is 100. the production order quantity for this problem is approximately:
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
In north korea, a farmer’s income is the same as a dentist’s income. in a country with a mixed or market economy, the difference between those two professions might be more than 5 times different. how can you explain the fact that individuals doing the same work in different countries do not earn comparable salaries?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:20
Although appealing to more refined tastes, art as a collectible has not always performed so profitably. during 2003, an auction house sold a sculpture at auction for a price of $10,211,500. unfortunately for the previous owner, he had purchased it in 2000 at a price of $12,177,500. what was his annual rate of return on this sculpture? (a negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Noeleen auto mall, ltd. recently completed an initial public offering (ipo) for $23,000,000 by listi...
Questions
question
Spanish, 23.04.2021 08:50
question
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 08:50
question
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 09:00
Questions on the website: 13722363