Amartya sen, a professor of economics at harvard and a nobel laureate, has argued: "for india to match china in its range of manufacturing it needs a better-educated and healthier labor force at all levels of society." source: amartya sen, "why india trails china," wall street journal, june 19, 2013. education and health care are important for economic growth because
a. the average diet in india is far less healthy than in china.
b. a well-educated and healthy workforce has higher productivity.
c. jobs are being outsourced from india to china as a result of faster internet technology.
d. it is unfair when some people have better education and health care than others.
india has been able to experience rapid economic growth since 1991 despite poor educational and health care systems because
a. the government scaled back central planning, reduced regulations, and introduced market-based reforms.
b. the indian people started to put aside their religous and cultural differences to make the country a better place.
c. the government provided modern sewer systems serviced to the vast majority of it inhabitants.
d. the british left a legacy of infrastructure including an efficient train system and world class ports.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.