Suppose that jack, hal, and sophia enter into an agreement in regards to the sale of the restaurant. the contract includes the non-competition agreement. a few months later, jack decides that he will sell the frozen food in violation of non-competition agreement, unless if hal and sophia agree to pay him an extra $100,000. hal and sophia agree, since they do not want to fight. six months later, however, they still have not paid and jack sues. what is the result?
a. hal and sophia would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration. b. hal and sophia would win, since jack already had a prior existing legal duty to not compete with them. c. jack would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration. d. jack would win since hal and sophia agreed to pay the extra $100,000.

Standardization is associated with which of the following management orientations? a) ethnocentric orientation b) polycentric orientation c) regiocentric orientation d) geocentric orientation

Fanning books buys books and magazines directly from publishers and distributes them to grocery stores. the wholesaler expects to purchase the following inventory: april may june required purchases (on account) $ 111,000 $ 131,000 $ 143,000 fanning books accountant prepared the following schedule of cash payments for inventory purchases. fanning books suppliers require that 85 percent of purchases on account be paid in the month of purchase; the remaining 15 percent are paid in the month following the month of purchase. required complete the schedule of cash payments for inventory purchases by filling in the missing amounts. determine the amount of accounts payable the company will report on its pro forma balance sheet at the end of the second quarter.

An employer who is considering hiring eva has asked donna, eva’s former supervisor, for a report on eva. in truth, eva’s work for donna has been only average. however, eva is donna’s friend, and donna knows that eva probably will not get the job if she says anything negative about eva, and donna knows that eva desperately needs the job. further, donna knows that if the situation were reversed, she would not want eva to mention her deficiencies. nevertheless, it has been donna’s policy to reveal the deficiencies of employees when she has been asked for references by employers, and she knows that some of eva’s faults may be bothersome to this particular employer. finally, this employer has leveled with donna in the past when donna has asked for a report on people who have worked for him. should donna reveal deficiencies in eva’s past performance? (remember to use one of the three moral theories acceptable for this test to solve this dilemma. any discussion of any personal opinion, religious perspective, or theory other than the moral theories acceptable for this test will result in a score of "0" for this question.)